Pakistani Army Pushing Back Taliban

May 20th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , ,

pakistani army buner swat valleyThe offensive the Pakistani army launched against the Taliban last week seems to be going rather well. The army says that it has killed scores of militants, and that it is slowly taking control of regions it lost to the extremist organization earlier this year.

Pakistani soldiers have nearly cleared Taliban fighters from a district 100 km (60 miles) from the capital in heavy fighting in which the militants have suffered heavy casualties, the military said…

The military said security forces had made “considerable headway” in intense fighting in Buner.

“Most of the area has been cleared … terrorists have suffered heavy casualties,” the military said late on Tuesday.

Emboldened by a February peace pact, Taliban from Swat moved into Buner in early April, clashing with police in a drive to impose hardline rule.

Not only are the Taliban pushed back, polls also show that Pakistanis support the military offensive en masse. Experts believe support will drop once more civilians get caught in or are displaced by the fighting, but, for now, the Taliban finds itself under attack by both the country’s military and its civilian population.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. walker
    May 21st, 2009 at 05:18
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I’m having trouble taking the news out of Pakistan at face value. It seems awful scripted. There isn’t any mention of civilian or army casualties for one thing. The whole thing seems almost staged to get more aid and technology from the USA.

    Occasion2B

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.