<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly, the Uglier, and the Ugliest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2009/06/07/obama-addresses-the-muslim-world-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/06/07/obama-addresses-the-muslim-world-2/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:50:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PhillyChief</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/06/07/obama-addresses-the-muslim-world-2/comment-page-1/#comment-95896</link>
		<dc:creator>PhillyChief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/2009/06/07/obama-addresses-the-muslim-world-2/#comment-95896</guid>
		<description>If by &quot;religious freedom&quot; you mean lording your religious beliefs over others, using it as justification to limit the rights of others and using it as an excuse to not provide your children with vital vaccinations and more serious health care then yes, such &quot;religious freedom&quot; needs to be reigned in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If by &#8220;religious freedom&#8221; you mean lording your religious beliefs over others, using it as justification to limit the rights of others and using it as an excuse to not provide your children with vital vaccinations and more serious health care then yes, such &#8220;religious freedom&#8221; needs to be reigned in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilky</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/06/07/obama-addresses-the-muslim-world-2/comment-page-1/#comment-95862</link>
		<dc:creator>wilky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 22:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/2009/06/07/obama-addresses-the-muslim-world-2/#comment-95862</guid>
		<description>I never understood the cutting of dealers. I do understand if you have a &quot;hot&quot; product you can limit you distribution to drive up price. But really, what about Chrysler or GM would anybody consider hot? 

I&#039;m not buying from them because I won&#039;t buy from an entity that has been taken over by the government in this fashion. I will stand with the secured bondholders, even if our president won&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understood the cutting of dealers. I do understand if you have a &#8220;hot&#8221; product you can limit you distribution to drive up price. But really, what about Chrysler or GM would anybody consider hot? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not buying from them because I won&#8217;t buy from an entity that has been taken over by the government in this fashion. I will stand with the secured bondholders, even if our president won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Merritt</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/06/07/obama-addresses-the-muslim-world-2/comment-page-1/#comment-95856</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Merritt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 19:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/2009/06/07/obama-addresses-the-muslim-world-2/#comment-95856</guid>
		<description>So PZ Meyers is a states rights guy now?  Naw, that wouldn&#039;t be his style, I think.  I&#039;m with him on the &quot;44 more&quot; part, but nothing else in his post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So PZ Meyers is a states rights guy now?  Naw, that wouldn&#8217;t be his style, I think.  I&#8217;m with him on the &#8220;44 more&#8221; part, but nothing else in his post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buckeye</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/06/07/obama-addresses-the-muslim-world-2/comment-page-1/#comment-95825</link>
		<dc:creator>Buckeye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 14:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/2009/06/07/obama-addresses-the-muslim-world-2/#comment-95825</guid>
		<description>Good movie, but the all-time speghetti western was Once Upon a Time in the West. 

I&#039;m afraid that I&#039;ll remain sketical about Hoyer et al&#039;s good intentions for now at least. I mean, are they prepared to track this down no matter where it leads? Yeah, right. Hoyer recommending that the Auto Task Force look into this is funny - that&#039;s the LAST body that should investigate this matter, since it is running the deal to begin with (protestations to the contrary notwithstanding). Indeed, Hoyer at al&#039;s suggestion should remind folks to be ever skeptical about Democrat motives even when it might appear on the surface that they are doing the right thing. 

The Good (scenario): Hoyer and ilk are truly concerned about the political ramifications of Obama&#039;s and the &quot;progressive&quot; left&#039;s economic policies, which could seriously jeopardize the Democrat&#039;s long-term prospects. They know that taking on Obama frontally could cause internal damage to the party, and/or themselves, but they think the alternative of doing nothing appears to be a worse bet. They could be signaling the need for an internal housecleaning that would have to appear from the outside as the Obama administration &#039;growing on the job.&quot;   

The Bad (scenario): many of the dealers on the ax list are now under the protection of Hoyer et al, whether that was the administration plan all along, or Hoyer is working his own branch of the Democrat party machinery. Hoyer will now work to rescue his new clients and/or cushion the blow somehow, and those dealers will now be under the Democrat umbrella $$. See: Maggie&#039;s Farm, http://maggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com/archives/11636-Mission-Accomplished!.html. The original criteria used to make the selections will never see the light of day, but the parties will be &quot;satisfied.&quot; The media will credit Obama and the Task Force for compromising, finding solutions, etc. 

The Ugly (scenario): one potential snag - Who will actually buy the vehicles (including GM)? Local, state, and fed government can buy a lot, as well as fed &amp; state subsidized non-profits, but is that a sufficient market? Obama and Dems may not care: they rescue UAW, add some new dealer clients, and kick another problem down the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good movie, but the all-time speghetti western was Once Upon a Time in the West. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid that I&#8217;ll remain sketical about Hoyer et al&#8217;s good intentions for now at least. I mean, are they prepared to track this down no matter where it leads? Yeah, right. Hoyer recommending that the Auto Task Force look into this is funny &#8211; that&#8217;s the LAST body that should investigate this matter, since it is running the deal to begin with (protestations to the contrary notwithstanding). Indeed, Hoyer at al&#8217;s suggestion should remind folks to be ever skeptical about Democrat motives even when it might appear on the surface that they are doing the right thing. </p>
<p>The Good (scenario): Hoyer and ilk are truly concerned about the political ramifications of Obama&#8217;s and the &#8220;progressive&#8221; left&#8217;s economic policies, which could seriously jeopardize the Democrat&#8217;s long-term prospects. They know that taking on Obama frontally could cause internal damage to the party, and/or themselves, but they think the alternative of doing nothing appears to be a worse bet. They could be signaling the need for an internal housecleaning that would have to appear from the outside as the Obama administration &#8216;growing on the job.&#8221;   </p>
<p>The Bad (scenario): many of the dealers on the ax list are now under the protection of Hoyer et al, whether that was the administration plan all along, or Hoyer is working his own branch of the Democrat party machinery. Hoyer will now work to rescue his new clients and/or cushion the blow somehow, and those dealers will now be under the Democrat umbrella $$. See: Maggie&#8217;s Farm, <a href="http://maggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com/archives/11636-Mission-Accomplished" rel="nofollow">http://maggiesfarm.anotherdotcom.com/archives/11636-Mission-Accomplished</a>!.html. The original criteria used to make the selections will never see the light of day, but the parties will be &#8220;satisfied.&#8221; The media will credit Obama and the Task Force for compromising, finding solutions, etc. </p>
<p>The Ugly (scenario): one potential snag &#8211; Who will actually buy the vehicles (including GM)? Local, state, and fed government can buy a lot, as well as fed &amp; state subsidized non-profits, but is that a sufficient market? Obama and Dems may not care: they rescue UAW, add some new dealer clients, and kick another problem down the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
