Ex-Mormons Murdered in Mexico Were Real Men

July 11th, 2009 By: marc moore | Tags:

image Two leaders of Colonia LeBaron, a community of excommunicated Mormons with roots in the United States, were murdered because they dared to defy the drug/kidnapping gangs that have killed more than 3000 people in Chihuahua, Mexico in the last 18 months.

Benjamin LeBaron, 31 and Luis Widmar were forced out of their homes earlier this week and shot multiple times by gangsters who want to ensure that people in Chihuahua stay afraid of them. Both men died.

The tactic may well work. It’s been said that all that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. Sadly, doing nothing is the easiest thing to do in a conflict, a fact that goes a long way toward explaining the state of Mexico and the world at large.

LeBaron previously ran afoul of the gangs after his younger brother was kidnapped this spring. Unable and/or unwilling to pay a $1M ranson, LeBaron demanded that the government act to root out the criminals terrorizing Chihuahua. His brother was soon released unharmed, but LeBaron’s killers were obviously unwilling to let things go at that.

Benji gave frequent interviews to local and national media in recent months, led other caravans to the capital calling for a crackdown on crime and attended the graduation of elite state police units.

He became a hero for the many in Chihuahua sickened by gangsters and violence.

“We have been afraid, haven’t known how to speak,” Alejandro Rodriguez, from a farm village a 2-hour drive from Colonia LeBaron, said at the men’s graveside Thursday. “We’ve suffered the silence of the good people.”

But fame made targets of both Benji and his community.

“He was so outspoken. That was the reason for this,” Nathan LeBaron, 58, who was directing the hundreds of cars arriving for the funeral, said of Benji. “If we hadn’t stood up they wouldn’t have bothered us.”

That may or may not be the case. The 3000+ dead in Chihuahua would disagree, I think.

LeBaron’s sect has a bizarre, even perverse history, as described in the article. Say what you will about that, Benjamin LeBaron exhibited the character and courage of a real man, one willing to risk everything to do what was right. For that he deserves to be celebrated – and emulated – by all of us, regardless of race, creed, or color.

It should go without saying that society has both the right and the ability to rid itself of drug pushers, kidnappers, rapists, and murderers. It should, but evidently we need occasional reminders. Criminals prey on citizens by isolating them and applying force and fear. Society should respond not by excusing criminals’ evil behavior but rather by banding together and applying even more force to rid itself of its abhorrent parts.

That was Benjamin LeBaron’s message and it would behoove us all to remember and act on it.

Referring to my last post about gun control, consider how Benjamin’s situation might have been helped if he’d been armed comparably to his attackers. Is the world a better place because he died and his killers roam free? Has his moral code somehow been proven stronger because he was murdered?

No. The end of his life is compelling, perhaps, in the form of a martyr’s narrative. But how much more compelling would his life story have been had he lived to carry the fight to gangsters and rid his country of the criminals that plague it?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.