<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor Backers Prepare to Oppo Firefighter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/11/sotomayor-backers-prepare-to-oppo-firefighter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/11/sotomayor-backers-prepare-to-oppo-firefighter/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:19:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kastanj</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/11/sotomayor-backers-prepare-to-oppo-firefighter/comment-page-1/#comment-97923</link>
		<dc:creator>Kastanj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/11/sotomayor-backers-prepare-to-oppo-firefighter/#comment-97923</guid>
		<description>What in the heck do they have to gain from scrutinizing one sole guy in a complicated situation where &quot;their&quot; favorite person (Sotomayor) has already taken a manageable and largely forgotten hit? A power trip? Can&#039;t they handle ambiguities and contradictions?

This is not only wrong and a bit compulsive, it will also lay the groundwork of an exaggerating fear-mongering campaign by some people who will claim this is proof that the leftofascists are taking over or something and will soon start lynching people.

Worry about the insubstantial whining about Sotomayor instead of trying to discredit a person who happened to be vindicated by a higher authority, and now probably wants to be left alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What in the heck do they have to gain from scrutinizing one sole guy in a complicated situation where &#8220;their&#8221; favorite person (Sotomayor) has already taken a manageable and largely forgotten hit? A power trip? Can&#8217;t they handle ambiguities and contradictions?</p>
<p>This is not only wrong and a bit compulsive, it will also lay the groundwork of an exaggerating fear-mongering campaign by some people who will claim this is proof that the leftofascists are taking over or something and will soon start lynching people.</p>
<p>Worry about the insubstantial whining about Sotomayor instead of trying to discredit a person who happened to be vindicated by a higher authority, and now probably wants to be left alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plumber denver &#124; Plumber Supply</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/11/sotomayor-backers-prepare-to-oppo-firefighter/comment-page-1/#comment-97918</link>
		<dc:creator>Plumber denver &#124; Plumber Supply</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/11/sotomayor-backers-prepare-to-oppo-firefighter/#comment-97918</guid>
		<description>[...] Is there no depth to which liberal ideologues will not stoop? It seems that some of Sonia Sotomayor’s more devoted advocates are preparing to aim a campaign of “scrutiny” at Frank Ricci , the New Haven, Connecticut firefighter who sued the city Plumber Supply News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Is there no depth to which liberal ideologues will not stoop? It seems that some of Sonia Sotomayor’s more devoted advocates are preparing to aim a campaign of “scrutiny” at Frank Ricci , the New Haven, Connecticut firefighter who sued the city Plumber Supply News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norris Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/11/sotomayor-backers-prepare-to-oppo-firefighter/comment-page-1/#comment-97916</link>
		<dc:creator>Norris Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/11/sotomayor-backers-prepare-to-oppo-firefighter/#comment-97916</guid>
		<description>wSlightly off topic but appropriate to the white firefighter case....
When it comes to racial preferences, it&#039;s not always the whites who are the wronged party.

Recently The University of California  changed it&#039;s admission policy for all 9 of it&#039;s campuses.
Flooded by Asian students who tend to score higher on test scores and school grades, the US regants decided to downplay the importance of tests and grades in their admission policy
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/economy/ap/48683642.html
&quot;I like to call it affirmative action for whites,&quot; said Ling-chi Wang, a retired professor at UC Berkeley. &quot;I think it&#039;s extremely unfair to Asian-Americans on the one hand and underrepresented minorities on the other.&quot;
The new policy would eliminate the requirement that applicants take two SAT subject tests and reduce the number of students guaranteed admission based on grades and test scores alone. It takes effect for the freshman class of fall 2012.
It&#039;s a dramatic departure from the almost universal reliance on grades and tests scores in college placement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wSlightly off topic but appropriate to the white firefighter case&#8230;.<br />
When it comes to racial preferences, it&#8217;s not always the whites who are the wronged party.</p>
<p>Recently The University of California  changed it&#8217;s admission policy for all 9 of it&#8217;s campuses.<br />
Flooded by Asian students who tend to score higher on test scores and school grades, the US regants decided to downplay the importance of tests and grades in their admission policy<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/economy/ap/48683642.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/economy/ap/48683642.html</a><br />
&#8220;I like to call it affirmative action for whites,&#8221; said Ling-chi Wang, a retired professor at UC Berkeley. &#8220;I think it&#8217;s extremely unfair to Asian-Americans on the one hand and underrepresented minorities on the other.&#8221;<br />
The new policy would eliminate the requirement that applicants take two SAT subject tests and reduce the number of students guaranteed admission based on grades and test scores alone. It takes effect for the freshman class of fall 2012.<br />
It&#8217;s a dramatic departure from the almost universal reliance on grades and tests scores in college placement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
