Hillary Clinton Makes New York Extremely Angry

July 14th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: ,

hillaryThe New York Post:

Thanks a lot, Hillary!

In a surprise turnaround that will cost the city $260 million in back taxes and untold millions in future lost revenue, Hillary Rodham Clinton’s State Department has quietly reversed a longstanding policy requiring foreign governments to pay taxes on some diplomatic residences.

It’s a shocking about-face by Secretary of State Clinton — who repeatedly spoke in favor of the city’s right to collect the taxes when she was New York’s junior senator…

The Big Apple, which recently won a federal court ruling requiring India and Mongolia to fork over some $46 million in back taxes, is expected to lose about $7 million a year in current tax revenues.

That number could dramatically increase in the future if property taxes rise…

The $260 million figure represents the amount owed by all foreign countries in back taxes.

The new rule will exempt the quarters of all the diplomatic employees living in their government-owned housing, and wipe out any old tax bills or liens on those buildings.

Frankly, I’m not sure what to think about this. New York State isn’t happy, and from their perspective rightly so, but I understand Hillary’s decision all too well. She believes America should improve its relationships with foreign governments. What’s better way to do so than to tell them they can keep their money?

Also consider the following:

Patrick Kennedy, undersecretary of state for management, said the rules change comes because other countries do not apply similar taxes on US properties overseas, which include Army bases, FBI offices and State Department housing.

“Those countries have come to us and said, ‘Wait a minute. Why is New York taxing us when we don’t tax you?’ ” he said.

“This has become a diplomatic irritant. They’ve held up activity at those locations, not given us building permits.”

It’s not often that I side with the Obama administration, but I’m afraid I’ll have to do so on this one. It’s smart politics and just, considering the fact that foreign governments don’t force the US to pay taxes either.

Good call from Hillary, then.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.