<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New York Times Loses Its Credibility Completely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/15/the-new-york-times-loses-its-credibility-completely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/15/the-new-york-times-loses-its-credibility-completely/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:39:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Arvak</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/15/the-new-york-times-loses-its-credibility-completely/comment-page-1/#comment-98129</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Arvak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=15183#comment-98129</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In this case, I simply found the unequivocal statement to be a little too hasty.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Criticism put that way is fine.  But at the point you express criticism by imputing bad &lt;em&gt;intent&lt;/em&gt; on to those you disagree with, you&#039;re going to continue to have problems here.  I&#039;ve already had to edit several of your comments because of this persistent failing on your part and I am tiring of the effort.  If you can&#039;t find ways to express disagreement without attacking the personal character, integrity, or honesty of those you disagree with, you will unfortunately have to be banned from commenting on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In this case, I simply found the unequivocal statement to be a little too hasty.</p></blockquote>
<p>Criticism put that way is fine.  But at the point you express criticism by imputing bad <em>intent</em> on to those you disagree with, you&#8217;re going to continue to have problems here.  I&#8217;ve already had to edit several of your comments because of this persistent failing on your part and I am tiring of the effort.  If you can&#8217;t find ways to express disagreement without attacking the personal character, integrity, or honesty of those you disagree with, you will unfortunately have to be banned from commenting on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kastanj</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/15/the-new-york-times-loses-its-credibility-completely/comment-page-1/#comment-98127</link>
		<dc:creator>Kastanj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=15183#comment-98127</guid>
		<description>&quot;Kast, why do you keep interpreting all disagreement with you as an attempt to shut down discussion?&quot;

In this case, I simply found the unequivocal statement to be a little too hasty. It seems a bit baseless to me and thus the depiction of the NYT as completely useless in the discussion looks like a shifting of the goalposts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Kast, why do you keep interpreting all disagreement with you as an attempt to shut down discussion?&#8221;</p>
<p>In this case, I simply found the unequivocal statement to be a little too hasty. It seems a bit baseless to me and thus the depiction of the NYT as completely useless in the discussion looks like a shifting of the goalposts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Arvak</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/15/the-new-york-times-loses-its-credibility-completely/comment-page-1/#comment-98124</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Arvak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=15183#comment-98124</guid>
		<description>Kast, why do you keep interpreting all disagreement with you as an attempt to shut down discussion?  

Given the dominance of your viewpoints in the media, academia, and blogosphere, I think those who disagree with you ARE the discussion, not its end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kast, why do you keep interpreting all disagreement with you as an attempt to shut down discussion?  </p>
<p>Given the dominance of your viewpoints in the media, academia, and blogosphere, I think those who disagree with you ARE the discussion, not its end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orson Buggeigh</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/15/the-new-york-times-loses-its-credibility-completely/comment-page-1/#comment-98123</link>
		<dc:creator>Orson Buggeigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=15183#comment-98123</guid>
		<description>The New York Times has a long tradition of shilling for totalitarians and the left.  Walter Duranty&#039;s reporting on the great achievements of Stalin&#039;s USSR garnered a Pulitzer Prize for the NYT, even though reports were leaking out of the USSR about the purges, the starvation of non-conformist peasants, and other unsavory aspects of the &#039;worker&#039;s paradise.&#039;  The NYT didn&#039;t see any need to verify any of this or report on it, because Comrade Joe was a progressive in their opinion.  

It should surprise no one that the NYT continues to perform this way.  It is not incompetence, but cold, calculating, cynical propagandizing.  If there were a Dr. Josef Goebbels award for professing the Big Lie with a straight face, the NYT would have a room full of them.  I canceled my NYT subscription fifteen years ago, and don&#039;t miss it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times has a long tradition of shilling for totalitarians and the left.  Walter Duranty&#8217;s reporting on the great achievements of Stalin&#8217;s USSR garnered a Pulitzer Prize for the NYT, even though reports were leaking out of the USSR about the purges, the starvation of non-conformist peasants, and other unsavory aspects of the &#8216;worker&#8217;s paradise.&#8217;  The NYT didn&#8217;t see any need to verify any of this or report on it, because Comrade Joe was a progressive in their opinion.  </p>
<p>It should surprise no one that the NYT continues to perform this way.  It is not incompetence, but cold, calculating, cynical propagandizing.  If there were a Dr. Josef Goebbels award for professing the Big Lie with a straight face, the NYT would have a room full of them.  I canceled my NYT subscription fifteen years ago, and don&#8217;t miss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kastanj</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/07/15/the-new-york-times-loses-its-credibility-completely/comment-page-1/#comment-98122</link>
		<dc:creator>Kastanj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=15183#comment-98122</guid>
		<description>Wait, is this issue supposed to be settled all of a sudden? This seems to be some sort of attempt to close the discussion prematurely and label one side as discredited without really bothering to explain why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, is this issue supposed to be settled all of a sudden? This seems to be some sort of attempt to close the discussion prematurely and label one side as discredited without really bothering to explain why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
