“Stupid is as Stupid Does”
The recent contact between Henry Lewis Gates and Sgt. James Crowley probably wasn’t either man’s idea of how he performs at his best. Unfortunately, the media, and now the President of the United States have fanned this into an incident where both men feel that they have something personal invested in it, and cannot back down. Which is too bad, because both are basically good at what they do, if their previous records are any indication.
Professor Gates is a well known historian, with a long and respected career of studying the history of racial relations in the US. Sgt Crowley is a many year member of the police force, apparently liked and respected by members of his community, both Black and White. He has been a training officer for race relations in the department.
The meeting went poorly – and those of us who rely on what has been reported on the record have to look at the few comments from neighbors who observed it, and the reports filed by the police. The record is mixed – both men might have done things differently to remove the tension before the arrest. I can appreciate a fully exhausted professor returning home to find a stuck front door, and, in frustration, trying to force it. A neighbor called the police – apparently not recognizing Professor Gates – and the 911 dispatcher requested action, and Sgt. Crowley was the one to arrive on the scene. Judging strictly from the reports, the two men talked past each other. Not especially surprising if one is exhausted from 20 hours of plane travel, and one is dealing with increased anxiety of stepping into a possibly dangerous situation with an unknown person. The exchange went badly – the professor, quite possibly feeling an affront to his dignity and pride, responded defensively and angrily; the officer responded to the professor’s raised voice by asserting himself more forcefully. When the professor followed the policeman out, and continued shouting, the policeman decided to stop the deteriorating situation in a common manner – arresting the noisy party to forestall further escalation of the shouting match.
With twenty four hour hindsight, neither man looked totally blameless, although it appears that Sgt. Crowley worked strictly from the book, and moved to arrest Professor Gates only after the shouting moved out of the house. Ideally, both men would have looked at this and agreed to just quietly drop the matter, since neither looked totally sympathetic. A joint statement seemed to be heading in that direction.
Enter the media and the blogosphere. With plenty of publicity, and plenty of supporters for both men, a quiet agreement to drop the prosecution and the matter entirely seems unlikely. Especially after the President of the United States weighed in, calling the police department’s action’s “stupid.” Once again the issue has become a front page item, and partisans for each party are demanding complete vindication of their man, and an abject apology from the other.
While Professor Gates and Sgt. Crowley each have legitimate reason to feel that they are being mis-characterized by their detractors, the real prize for stupidity goes to the President. At a time when he has a financial meltdown, and restructuring of the auto industry, and efforts to repair and re-order health care on his agenda, he makes an unnecessary and polarizing statement about an issue he admits he has less than perfect knowledge about.
Apologies would be helpful, but forced apologies are worthless. At this point, it is unreasonable to ask either Professor Gates or Sgt. Crowley to apologize. However, since the President claims to be the cool, calm, rational one, perhaps he would be willing to go first, and apologize for his stupid stereotyping of the Cambridge Police Department as “stupid.” Maybe if the Most Powerful Man in the World (TM) can say he is sorry, and move on, the rest of us can too. Even, perhaps, one day, the professor and the policeman.










This just in:
Obama backs down from his comments agains the Cambridge Police “Acting Stupidly”
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN2447761120090724
“President Barack Obama backed down on Friday from a statement that police had “acted stupidly” in arresting a black scholar in a racially charged case that was rapidly becoming a distraction for Obama.”
“”Because this has been ratcheting up and I obviously helped to contribute ratcheting it up, I wanted to make clear in my choice of words I think I unfortunately gave an impression that I was maligning the Cambridge Police Department or Sgt. Crowley specifically,” Obama said. “And I could have calibrated those words differently.”"
He may have given an impression that he was maligning the Cambridge Police Department or Sgt. Crowley specifically? …Why did he add the word specifically, he could have left that out? Is this a greater net of maligning police or law enforcement alltogether? That was also a bad choice of words.
Thanks Jay.
It’s nice to see the President being a bit more thoughtful, but I agree, he really should not have tried to add qualifying language. Still, a step in the right direction.
How is this racial profiling? It is not like they went through the streets looking a black male. They responded to a 9-1-1 call. They were called to the house by someone.
If he needs to apologize for anything it’s for his getting into affairs that he doesn’t belong in.
I could really care less that the Prez stepped in it, nor do I really care what he said. The man’s a failure enough at his policies and attention shouldn’t be diverted from those failures.
I agree…..
Barak Obama had a JUDGMENT……..and of course it was WRONG!!!!!!
> If [Obama] needs to apologize for anything it’s for his getting into affairs that he doesn’t belong in.
+1, and it’s not the first time, either. His handlers need to keep a tighter rein on him. Of course, his handlers may be the source of the problem.
Signed,
A Libertarian
President Obama’s ‘kinda sorta not quite but almost apology’ doesn’t cut it. It is politician-speak, in the same manner as ‘mistakes were made.’
The first mistake was getting involved in something that wasn’t his business. The second was sticking by his remarks. The third mistake was the not quite apology. Mr. President, you are in a hole. Please put down the shovel.
The President’s statement was a step in the right direction. We need more of these.
With twenty four hour hindsight, neither man looked totally blameless, although it appears that Sgt. Crowley worked strictly from the book
How does working strictly by the book put ANY blame on Crowley? Deviating from “the book” is what would (most certainly) get him drawn and quartered. “By the book” is EXACTLY how he needed to act.
Additionally, Crowley couldn’t “talk past” Gates, other than in the sense that Gates completely refused to listen to him, instead choosing to drown out all attempts at communication with vituperous slanders and accusations, all at high volume. Instead, without stopping to consider why there was a cop on his doorstep, Gates automatically went into full aggressive-anger mode on the mistaken assumption the cop was only there because Gates is black.
Obama’s response was despicable, automatically calling out Crowley for proclaimed errors and intentional misresponse, and misrepresenting the facts to do so. Even Obama’s “apology” wasn’t one, but another Obamapology in which he regretted that his own screwup had been noticed.
If I were Crowley I would respectfully decline Obama’s invite to join he and Gates for a beer at the White House. And I’d have a good lawyer handy.
My personal sympathies tend to be with Sgt. Crowley. As you note, Tully, he played this one strictly according to the rules.
However, for strictly political purposes (Massachusetts is largely Democratic politically – think Senator Kennedy) it might be wise for the police to avoid yanking the President’s chain, or the chain of the Democratic party ‘professional victim’ lobby that sees all Blacks, Indians, and Hispanics as victims of racism, or the chain of the media elite, who all tend to see policemen as racist thugs and Blacks as victims. Because with a Black president, you don’t have to have a Ph.D from Haaa-vuhd to see how the liberal elites will play this thing: exactly as they have – mean, nasty racist young White policeman bullies frail, cane-using elderly Black professor.
Yes, the media elite view is crap. You said it Tully – Dr. Gates lost it, and screamed himself into the back of the squad car. But the perception put forth by the media elite is going to remain the poor jet-lagged guy hauled down to the station house for talking back. THAT is why it would have been good political sense for Sgt. Crowley to have let it drop – IF Professor Gates had let it drop. He didn’t, so Sgt. Crowley really has no choice but to defend himself. Which brings me back to my point – the really stupid party in this was the President of the United States. He’s made matters worse at each step. the belated offer to bring the boys together for a beer and a chat is too late. The story’s taken off, and run away from easy resolution by maintaining silence.
…you don’t have to have a Ph.D from Haaa-vuhd to see how the liberal elites will play this thing: exactly as they have…But the perception put forth by the media elite is going to remain the poor jet-lagged guy hauled down to the station house for talking back.
Of course, that really doesn’t change any minds, only reinforces those who would never believe anything else anyway. AND reinforces that liberal elites include media elites. My guess at this point is that what Obama really really wants right now is for those audiotapes to not be released anytime soon, and for the story to go away fast as it’s sucking oxygen out of both his agenda and poll ratings.
Anyway, anyone with more than a couple of brain cells knows that following a cop around in public and screaming at him is a prime way to get a few hour’s cool-down in a cell, regardless of one’s race.