The Best Guns for Home Defense

July 25th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

gunsAt the Art of Manliness.

Question: do you guys consider guns “manly”? Or are they simply tools to defend yourself against possible intruders and nothing more?

Or are you against guns in general?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Tully
    July 26th, 2009 at 00:19
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Guns are tools.

    Anyone who thinks a gunmakes them manly is also a tool, but that’s a different usage of the word.

  2. Interested
    July 26th, 2009 at 02:00
    Reply | Quote | #2

    They are neither manly nor limited to defensive tools.

  3. Orson Buggeigh
    July 26th, 2009 at 02:25
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Firearms, like automobiles or power drills, or even plain old axes and saws are tools. Personally, my preference for self defense is to keep my doors locked at night. However, the shotgun should effectively discourage any intruder who decides to break in. Never have had to find out, for which I am thankful.

    I don’t believe you need to own firearms to be ‘manly’ any more than you need to own power saws, wrench sets etc to be ‘manly.’ Women have been and are quite capable users of firearms. I suspect Sarah Palin is much more manly than many of my male colleagues. She hunts and cleans moose; one guy I know got green seeing a little blood when his kid got road rash falling off his tricycle.

  4. Grant
    July 27th, 2009 at 23:03
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Wow!!!!

    What a stupid question. Ask this to a gang banger and you will get a different answer. People who are serious about defense (And their firearm safety) don’t scratch there (Stuff) and wave around their firearms like “I have a gun, look at me”.

    This question is a joke.

    I think you can figure out where I stand on this one.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.