The Evil Called Goldman Sachs

July 27th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , ,

new york magazineNew York Magazine has an article up about Goldman Sachs; the only bank that is thriving despite the economic crisis.

The article’s introduction sets the tone: “Inside Goldman Sachs, America’s most successful, cynical, envied, despised, and (in its view, anyway) misunderstood engine of capitalism.”

Goldman Sachs is indeed envied, hated and despised, and all for one major reason: it’s successful. Those who hate success, especially success in a capitalistic society, can’t deal with the bank’s obvious strength. Especially the left has made it its personal mission to destroy the bank’s image. It pretends that the bank’s success is due to its tremendous political connections and nothing else.

The reality of the situation is, of course, that Goldman Sachs is not different from its main competitors. Well, not in this political regard, at least. They all have ties to the federal government. That’s why they got away with their irresponsible behavior for years.

What makes Goldman Sachs truly different is quality. Yes, that’s all, good, old fashioned quality. GS only hires the best of the best, and it has historically refrained from taking risks. Compared to other financial institutions, GS is terribly conservative.

That’s the difference, nothing else.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. James Raider
    July 28th, 2009 at 06:53
    Reply | Quote | #1

    GOLDMAN SACHS Wrote To The President…. A LETTER of THANKS.

    http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/07/goldman-sachs-thank-you-mr-president.html

    ……. And the circus continues, with Taxpayer singing the tune.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.