Black Cop Lashes Out at Gates, Obama

July 31st, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , ,

Sgt. Leon Lashley, the African American police officer who defended his colleague James Crowley when he was labeled a racist by Harvard Professor Henry Gates and accused of “acting stupidly” by President Barack Obama, wrote a passionate letter to the president, in which he blasts especially Gates for creating the circumstances in which he, Lashley, is labelled an “uncle Tom” and a traitor to his race, only because he defended “a friend and colleague who happens to be white.”

The letter was given to Obama by Sgt. Crowley when he came to the White House for a beer with both Gates and Obama.

Hear Wolf Blitzer read the letter out loud on CNN:
YouTube Preview Image

Lashley touches on something of great importance: the way African Americans limit themselves, and fellow blacks. Blacks who dare behave different are labelled ‘traitors’ and seen as ‘fake black.’ Ironically, this part of black subculture is one of the main reasons why so many African Americans continue to live in poverty and well below their abilities.

Americans have to become colorblind and their president should lead the way. Obama promised to be post-racial last year, but proved to be anything but when his friend Gates was arrested after he insulted an officer at duty.

He called this a “teaching moment,” which we can only hope it is.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. c3
    August 1st, 2009 at 01:58
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Ouch!

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.