Obama raises 10-year deficit to $9 trillion

August 22nd, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

america is brokeGood news! President Obama will adjust his 10-year budget deficit projection. You see, his earlier projection of a $7 trillion deficit was too low.

The Obama administration will raise its 10-year budget deficit projection to approximately $9 trillion from $7.108 trillion in a report next week, a senior administration official told Reuters on Friday. The higher deficit figure, based on updated economic data, brings the White House budget office into line with outside estimates and gives further fuel to President Barack Obama’s opponents, who say his spending plans are too expensive in light of budget shortfalls.

The White House took heat for sticking with its $7.108 trillion forecast earlier this year after the Congressional Budget Office forecast that deficits between 2010 and 2019 would total $9.1 trillion.

As Hot Air rightly points out, this is the same CBO that has ‘been warning us for months that ObamaCare will be a massive boondoggle. (And even CBO might be lowballing it.)’

The Obama administration knew all along, of course, and it’s likely that its deficit projections will be raised again. And again.

Obama’s economic policy truly is horrendous and worse than irresponsible.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Interested
    August 22nd, 2009 at 13:09
    Reply | Quote | #1

    455B is bad, so that means 900B must be better!

    Wonder how many of the Great Spender-in-Chief’s peeps are acting out the Career builder Super bowl commercial.

    - – - – I like how the one goes “OOOOOOhh’ , realizes the seriousness of the implications, turns the chart and then they all go back to partying. – - – -

  2. Mike
    August 23rd, 2009 at 05:01
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I wonder if their number was low originally because they were trying to push through a huge spending package at the time? No, I can’t recall one.

  3. Doomed
    August 23rd, 2009 at 06:02
    Reply | Quote | #3

    The spin is that the democrats have to spend this much to fix all that the republicans screwed up.

    See thats how they can justify spending trillions we dont have.

    where I come from if you spend this months rent money on a new mink coat you dont fix that by spending next months rent money on a new shotgun for the hubby.

    But that sorta is the Democrats reasoning right now. The GOP did it so now we gotta fix their mistakes by making a whole bunch of our own.

    We have to fix their irresponsibility by being irresponsible ourselves.

  4. Interested
    August 23rd, 2009 at 11:29
    Reply | Quote | #4

    VA workers given millions in bonuses as vets await checks

    http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/22/veterans.affairs.bonuses/index.html

    Lets see – now if that were private sector – the Great One would have mandated the director’s termination, demanded return of bonus’s – and given the company to the Unions.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.