China death row organ donor scandal exposed

August 27th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , ,

Let’s say you – a highly authoritarian leader – are in charge of a gigantic country with a population of over one billion, which means there are a lot of citizens in need of well working organs, but who has one major problem: almost nobody is willing to donate organs voluntarily because of religion.

What do you do?

Executed prisoners in China are being stripped of their kidneys, livers and hearts in a practice so widespread that two out of three transplant operations rely on organs removed from condemned criminals.

The China Daily newspaper, in a first public acknowledgement of the reliance on prisoners for body parts, said that 65 per cent of donations came from death row. Huang Jiefu, the country’s Deputy Health Minister, said that condemned prisoners were “definitely not a proper source for organ transplants”.

Despite a 2007 regulation barring trading in human tissue, demand for new organs far exceeds legitimate supply.

Only about 130 people have signed up to donate organs since 2003, according to research by Professor Chen Zhonghua at the Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital.

Ah, the lovely nature of authoritarian regimes who have no morals whatsoever.

Hey, when will the United Nations start criticizing China instead of obsessing over Israel?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    August 29th, 2009 at 04:13
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Hey, when will the United Nations start criticizing China instead of obsessing over Israel?

    Probably when they’re reformed to make them truly independent rather than a marionette with strings to be pulled by its members, and especially the permanent Security Council ones (including the United States). Let us not forget who else has a seat on that council: China.

    The trouble with the United Nations is that the veto power of its permanent members effectively stops the organization from taking any real action. If something is done that a member doesn’t like, it is stopped. I guarantee you that yelling at Israel is the only thing the UN will ever do to that country. If it tries to take sanctions, the U.S. will stop it with a veto. As will Russia with any real action against itself or a Middle Eastern country.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.