Republicans Present Another Serious Alternative Health Care Plan

October 1st, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , ,

Earlier this year, U.S. President Barack Obama said he would listen to Republicans who’d propose serious alternative health care plans. Well, time to deliver on this promise, I’d say:

Rep. Tom Price (R-GA), chairman of the Republican Study Committee, has joined a host of other Republicans in the House of Representatives by crafting a serious conservative alternative to the health plans that the President and the Democratic leadership are trying to push through Congress.

Dr. Price, who was a practicing physician for nearly 25 years before coming to Congress, has made a diagnosis and offered his prescription for what ails the current health care system.

Price writes, “Contrary to what the president has tried to convince the American people of, while we oppose his misguided ideas, Republicans are committed to positive health reform. No one in Congress finds the status quo acceptable.”

But, but, but… I was sure Republicans refused to even consider fixing health care!

Dr. Price has offered a third way– one that moves away from the current third-party dominated system to give patients more direct control over their own health care decisions and dollars. His legislation, the Empower Patients First Act, would:

* Fix the unfairness in the tax treatment of health insurance by extending a tax credit or deduction to those without employer-sponsored insurance;

* Use automatic enrollment, with a right to “opt out” of health insurance coverage, and promote defined-contributions for employer plans, instead of using government coercion and mandates, to expand coverage;

* Establish health plan portals in the states so that patients can own and control their own health insurance;

* Offer low-income Americans the option of a voucher to purchase private coverage; and

* Give states incentives to experiment with how best to cover high cost individuals.

Now, that sounds like a plan. Doesn’t it?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. UNRR
    October 2nd, 2009 at 13:06
    Reply | Quote | #1

    This post has been linked for the HOT5 Daily 10/02/2009, at The Unreligious Right

  2. Tully
    October 2nd, 2009 at 18:08
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Matches well with other GOP plans that Pbama claims don’t exist.

  3. Wellescent Health Blog
    October 2nd, 2009 at 19:54
    Reply | Quote | #3

    It is very unfortunate that the plan is coming so late in the game. Some of the ideas could have served to support a bipartisan bill. Now, the ideas from this bill will likely only be used to criticize the existing bill when elements of the bill could in fact be offering some decent ideas to the discussion.

  4. Dan Davis
    October 5th, 2009 at 17:17
    Reply | Quote | #4

    @Wellescent Health Blog
    I do not believe that a “bipartisan” bill would have been possible under any circumstances. Primarily because health care is only part of this effort. Control of this segment of the economy is, and has been for a long time an important component of the left’s expectation of an ideological resurgence. There is virtually nothing about this debate that has changed in the nearly 20 years since Hillarycare. The left refuses to give an inch, it’s basically full control or nothing at all for them and for the Republicans, well once they figure out how to get something for themselves out of it, they may get on board.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.