O’Reilly’s Best Radical Friend: 9/11 Victims Deserved It

If you read the post I wrote yesterday about Marc Lamont Hill you know that the Fox News analyst and frequent guest on Bill O’Reilly’s “The O’Reilly Factor,” is a radical leftist. He, I showed yesterday linking to several posts at David Horowitz’s NewsRealblog, admires black racists and extremists like Assata Shakur and Khallid Muhammad. They are his heroes.

And still O’Reilly takes this man serious and ignores his radicalism.

Perhaps this evidence of Hill’s radical beliefs will encourage O’Reilly – and Fox News as a whole – to oust him:

Hill: “He has the right to make [those comments], in fact he has the responsibility to make [those comments] as an academic if he believes them to be true… and if he can empirically substantiate them. And I think he’s done that.”

Hill said that about Ward Churchill. Churchill had written an op-ed saying the victims of 9/11 had themselves to thank for the attacks. They, Churchill said, were “little Eichmanns” who deserved to die because of their complicity in the grand American conspiracy to dominate the world.

Notice that Hill didn’t merely say Churchill was right to say what he said “if he believes” those words “to be true,” but that he, Hill, believes Churchill had “empirically substantiated” these comments (that the victims of 9/11 were “little Eichmanns”).

Hill isn’t a truther like Obama’s former Green Jobs Czar Van Jones: he’s worse. He actually believes that the victims of 9/11 deserved to die.

And you know what’s even worse than that? He made those comments on the “O’Reilly Factor.” He said Churchill was right to blame the victims of 9/11 for their own horrible deaths and O’Reilly asked him back on nonetheless. Not once, but dozens of times.

Incredible.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. mabelsigman
    October 7th, 2009 at 11:12
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Plenty of jobs in medical billing, get your degree in medical billing and get a job in medical billing find info at http://bit.ly/l7ZmZ

  2. Muslim
    October 7th, 2009 at 11:51
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Islam is peace.

  3. Devil’s Advocate
    October 8th, 2009 at 16:53
    Reply | Quote | #3

    As if anything that happens on O’Reilly’s show needs to be taken seriously.

    All these “news sources” that keep pumpin’ out this tired “19 Arabs with boxcutters took down America” bullshit demonstrate why the Mainstream Media is fast becoming a thing of the past.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.