Time Publishes Palin-Hitpiece

October 7th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , , , , ,

sarah palin going rogue an american lifeIt’s becoming more than a little frustrating that leftist magazines, newspapers and news channels continue to go after Governor Sarah Palin as if she was public enemy number one. See here, for instance, Time’s latest article about the governor. The headline: “If You Must Know: How Did Sarah Palin Write Her Memoir So Fast?”

Palin’s publisher says the answer is simple: hard work. “When she resigned as governor, she had a lot more time and was able to really devote herself full-time to writing the book,” says Tina Andreadis, a spokesperson for HarperCollins. “That’s really all that there is.”
(See pictures of Sarah Palin.)

Well, there’s also this: Palin had help. Editorial sidekicks are par for the course in political memoirs, though ghostwriters say many pols are heavily involved in the writing process. Palin’s assist came from Lynn Vincent, a writer for the Christian news magazine WORLD, who has also co-authored several other books.

The author of the hitpiece, Laura Fitzpatrick, goes on about the ghostwriter for, well, pretty much the rest of the article.

Now, Palin obviously used a ghostwriter – a professional author to help her out. So you could say that there isn’t a problem with Fitzpatrick taking a closer look at Vincent’s role.

Sadly, that’s not what Fitzpatrick does. The intention isn’t to analyze Vincent’s input but to convince the reader that Palin had little to nothing to do with this entire project. All she did was keeping a journal, the Time ‘journalist’ wants to have you believe. The real author is Vincent, not the rogue politician from Alaska.

Time minimizes Palin’s role for one rather obvious reason: “Going Rogue: An American Life” is a major bestseller. If Palin would be credited for its success, she should be taken seriously as a politician, intellectual and as a writer.

The left can’t take Palin seriously. They can’t give her credit for any intellectual achievements. They ridiculed her last year and continue to do so today, knowing that she poses an enormous threat to them and to the party they support. Taking her seriously, treating her with respect means Independent voters may take her seriously as well – it’ll make her an even bigger threat than she already is.

So they think of a new narrative: “Going Rogue” wasn’t written by Palin but by Vincent. No need to give her credit for it, then. Nope, nothing to see here; Palin is and will always be the ‘dumb blonde from Alaska.’

Are you falling for the MSM’s latest anti-Palin talking point? Didn’t think so.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jay_C
    October 7th, 2009 at 18:11
    Reply | Quote | #1

    This is the key:
    “knowing that she poses an enormous threat to them and to the party they support.”

    And the more the left pokes at the minutae like this (as the left uses ghostwriters/ hires help too), and not debate what she stands for politcally and the issues / stances that she finds important, it will only hurt the left. The public is starting to see this game of back and forth politics for what it is, a game, and not important to the real issues of the day.

  2. Thalia
    October 7th, 2009 at 18:11
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I am a moderate and I think Sarah Palin is an absolute joke. So do all the other “moderates” I know. Her book will be a bestseller but she will never hold public office again. In 1-2 years, it will be a case a Palin Who? Just like it should be.

  3. Jay_C
    October 7th, 2009 at 18:12
    Reply | Quote | #3

    If she wasn’t a threat, they’d leave her alone.

  4. Oliver21
    October 7th, 2009 at 18:22
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Jay C

    You make the assumption that because they talk about her she must be a threat. Most of the people I know think she is a joke and they talk or read about her from that perspective.

  5. Tully
    October 7th, 2009 at 18:32
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Spot on, Jay C.

    The threat she poses for the left is not really electoral. As I noted when she resigned as Guv, quitting high office is rarely a good path to acheiving higher office. The threat she poses to the left is as a gadfly and rally standard, a spokesperson for an ideological faction.

  6. Suzi
    October 7th, 2009 at 18:58
    Reply | Quote | #6

    It is intellectually dishonest (ie. a lie) to say that you have read her or listened to her and still consider her “a joke”. If you disagree with her views, you have an argument. But, to continue spouting the narrative that she is “a joke” while claiming you have read or listened to her makes you look like a dimwit.

  7. Jay_C
    October 7th, 2009 at 19:00
    Reply | Quote | #7

    @Oliver21
    well,if that is the case, then there is a lot of IDLE chatter from the left political blogosphere, when there are more pressing issues to discuss…

    so which is it? she isn’t a threat and there is a lot of idle chatter about her binga joke?

    or she is a threat and she is called a joke becuase there is no response to her talking points?

  8. Jay_C
    October 7th, 2009 at 19:02
    Reply | Quote | #8

    @Tully
    Agreed Tully…

  9. greg
    October 7th, 2009 at 19:58
    Reply | Quote | #9

    Palin finished her book early probably because it was largely written long before she signed a contract. She knew from day 1 that she was a “historic” candidate, the first woman on a gop ticket. Within days of the election rumors of a multimillion dollar book deal started circulating. Does anyone with a bit of sense think that she sat on her hands until she signed a contract in April, not putting down a word on paper? 0bama Time and all the rest of the 0bama obsessed media, and all those on the loony left hate Palin simply because she represents ideas and opinions still held by the majority of people. The loons know that their guy is a fluke, that it took $750 million, 2 years of non-stop campaigning, thousands of media cheerleaders coast to coast, and it still took a huge finanical crisis to drag him across the finishline. They know that if Palin choses to run, she’ll win the nomination easily, and could very well kick their sorry excuse of a candidate to the curb.

  10. Stacy
    October 8th, 2009 at 00:40

    Suzi, I agree 100%. I would like them to start giving examples of her “stupidity” without quoting Tina Fey.
    I know they have never read her Facebook statements. I know they know nothing of her achievements as Governor. I know they have never seen “Media Malpractice”, nor do they understand what happened during the campaign. I know that all they know is what they have been told to think.

    I guess that actually makes them the stupid one.

  11. Jack
    October 8th, 2009 at 04:26

    Palin is the real deal .. a shinning star that may lead the US out of this terrible time in their History. There is obviously no one else that can do this , republican or democrat …

  12. wnwmd
    October 8th, 2009 at 05:07

    Sarah Palin is the antithesis of Barack Obama. She stands for fiscal responsibility, personal freedom and a culture of life. She is a true citizen politician and a Patriot. She loves her country. She is highly intelligent and she is not tied to a political machine or corporate interests. She threatens the left like no other candidate since Ronald Reagan. She is being attacked on a daily basis for this reason. If you believe that she is stupid or shallow or a caribou barbie, then you are either naive or stupid and seriously underestimate her power and potential.

  13. Sapwolf
    October 8th, 2009 at 06:37

    Sarah Palin will win the GOP nomination and defeat Obama in a tough fight in 2012.

    The reason will be the Independents will gradually learn who the real Sarah Palin is, not the SRM caricature.

    She already is getting more popular with the Indies who are fiscal conservatives, and with the Tea Party Movement.

    But the real reason is that Obama is showing exactly the lack of leadership and far left extremism that we would expect based not on his campaign speeches but on a serious vetting of his character, his past record which has zero accomplishments, the people he hangs out with and looks up to, and his failure as POTUS.

    If you analyze both people, clearly more than any other politician, Sara Palin is the opposite of Obama. She is the Anti-Obama.

  14. Bill589
    October 8th, 2009 at 08:26

    The people I know who think she is a “joke” have never read anything she wrote. One guy just told me, “She can’t put two sentences together.” She has a degree in journalism! I think people have heard and read, over and over, ad infinitum, that she’s dumb. So they figure it must be true. It’s not. I’ve never noticed anyone so denigrated as Sarah Palin. Whatever her abilities are, she hasn’t deserved this.

  15. Mary B.
    October 8th, 2009 at 09:41

    Palin, the Quitter Ex Governor of Twitter and the failed Republican Vice Presidential candidate of Facebook should save her pronouncements for the National Enquirer and the Star.

  16. Cliff W
    October 8th, 2009 at 13:41

    Actually those two publications would merit most of the stuff that has been written about her, not by her.

  17. Jeb
    October 8th, 2009 at 21:14

    The Palin jokes are not about fear, they are about lazy humor. She has a set of gags that are already written and it is easy enough to churn out another couple hundred words.

    BTW If I were a pure partisan with only electoral concerns in mind I would hope Palin wins the nomination in 2012. Personally I would hope a different wing of the party wins. I’m sure this will be taken as an endorsement by her supporters.

    PALIN/HUCKABEE 2012!!!

  18. Doomed
    October 9th, 2009 at 03:57

    Sunlight Before Signing: Too often bills are rushed through Congress and to the president before the public has the opportunity to review them. As president, Obama will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House Web site for five days.

  19. Vlad
    October 10th, 2009 at 19:16

    Palin isn’t a threat, not to me. She’s a dope. Anyone who believes the Earth is only 6,000 years old is an intellectual houseplant. We might as well elect Paris Hilton and give her the launch codes. Heck, even the GOP is distancing itself rapidly from Palin. Her fans make big numbers on Facebook (Facebook! What a joke!), but in reality represent a tiny minority of voters. No threat here, folks. Palin will never be President, not of the U.S.A., anyway.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.