Haha, Ezra Klein Does Have a Sense of Humor

October 10th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Leave a comment

ezra klein is funnyWho, I ask you, who, would’ve thought? Ezra Klein – the man who takes himself way too seriously – does have a sense of humor:

I give David Brooks a hard time sometimes, but I really do wish the conservative movement would follow his example. “If I were in Congress, I’d figure there’s an 80 percent chance of something like [the Baucus bill] passing anyway,” he writes. “I might as well get engaged as a provisional supporter to fight to make it better, or at least to fight off the coming onslaught to make it worse.”

Haha, funny as hell. Yeah, you’d wish more Republicans were like Brooks, haha, because Brooks is really not a conservative at all and because he’s more than willing to let progressives ram their big government plans through Congress.

And you’re a progressive.

Haha, that’s hi-la-ri-ous.

You were being ironic, right?

Right?…

Oh, wait, you weren’t? You actually thought readers would take you seriously?

Dang, and there I was thinking you were secretly a funny guy.

Well, you are, of course, you’re just not aware of it.

Come to think of it, that makes it even more hysterical.

So, thanks for entertaining me Ezra! I needed that this morning.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Patrick Glenn
    October 10th, 2009 at 20:24
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I wish more Marxists were like David Horowitz.

  2. Michael van der Galien
    October 11th, 2009 at 10:51
    Reply | Quote | #2

    LOL!!

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.