Good News: Russia Looking at China for Inspiration

October 20th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , , , , ,

Yeah, it’s clear to me that this is exactly what Russia needs right now; government, China-style:

Nearly two decades after the collapse of the Communist Party, Russia’s rulers have hit upon a model for future success: the Communist Party.

Or at least, the one that reigns next door.

Like an envious underachiever,Vladimir V. Putin’s party, United Russia, is increasingly examining how it can emulate the Chinese Communist Party, especially its skill in shepherding China through the financial crisis relatively unbowed.

United Russia’s leaders even convened a special meeting this month with senior Chinese Communist Party officials to hear firsthand how they wield power.

Now, we all knew that Putin and Medvedev weren’t exactly the enlightened chaps the MSM pretend they are, but this goes far. Even for them. The Russian people were nearly destroyed by communism; so what do their new, capitalist rulers do? Right, abolish freedom and repeat the same mistakes their fathers and grandfathers made before them.

Read my entire post at Hot Air.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Chuck Norton
    October 20th, 2009 at 22:18
    Reply | Quote | #1

    China avoided the economic crisis because they arent stupid with their monetary policy and they arent stupid with their investments. The rules our government put in place and used guaranteed the crisis would happen.

    It is a sad day when China can implement smart economic policy better than the United States. Of course China’s policy has the goal of making money and economic growth, our policy is designed for social engineering, self serving political favoritism and corruption.

  2. Michael Merritt
    October 21st, 2009 at 02:23
    Reply | Quote | #2

    In my opinion, China hasn’t really been communist for a while. Highly authoritarian to be sure, and a one-party state to boot, but I don’t think communist accurately describes them anymore, no matter what they wish to call themselves.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.