Nicolas Sarkozy distancing himself from Obama

October 26th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , , ,

Fed up with Barack Obama’s naiveté and far-left agenda, French President Nicolas Sarkozy has decided to distance himself from his American colleague. Where Sarkozy once was strongly pro-American, he has now shifted his focus from the U.S. to other international allies.

Didier Billion of the Institute of International & Strategic Relations says: “Sarkozy has clearly been thrown off course in his relations with America.” Another foreign affairs expert, Bruno Tertrais from the Foundation for Strategic Research, adds: “There is an annoyance about what the French see as naivety in the Obama administration.”

One major sticking point has been President Obama’s softer stance on Iran, while President Sarkozy prefers a more hawkish approach. Sarkozy said last month: “I support America’s outstretched hand. But what has the international community gained from these offers of dialogue? Nothing but more enriched uranium and centrifuges.”

It’s fascinating to see just how much America’s relationships with traditional allies has changed since Obama took office. Countries that were decidedly pro-American under George W. Bush, feel betrayed by his successor. Governments that, on the other hand, opposed Bush strongly, are Obama’s biggest fans.

Read my whole post at Hot Air.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Doomed
    October 26th, 2009 at 03:06
    Reply | Quote | #1

    “I support America’s outstretched hand. But what has the international community gained from these offers of dialogue? Nothing but more enriched uranium and centrifuges.”

    I guess the French President doesnt share some of the American Dove’s soft power stances when it comes to certain foreign policy strategy.

    This president is looking worse then Jimmy Carter did. The only question is how much damage the insane, run amuck left congress will do before we vote them out in 2010.

  2. Rudi666
    October 26th, 2009 at 16:19
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Funny but I could find any links to this supposed Reuters analysis. A Google search at Reuters yields nothing like this:
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Sarkozy+shifting+focus+Obama+naivety+site%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2F&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

  3. CStanley
    October 26th, 2009 at 16:57
    Reply | Quote | #3
  4. Tully
    October 27th, 2009 at 15:43
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Countries that were decidedly pro-American under George W. Bush, feel betrayed by his successor.

    Gee, I wonder why eastern Europe, Honduras, or Israel would feel that way…much less other nations.

  5. Rudi666
    October 27th, 2009 at 19:04
    Reply | Quote | #5

    Countries that were decidedly pro-American under George W. Bush, feel betrayed by his successor.
    Polling shows that Poland’s public welcomes Obamama over the failed Bush administration.
    http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/09/21/not-a-snub/

    This is not true. It is not even remotely true. As that Economist article I mentioned the other day told us, Obama has a higher approval rating in Poland than Bush did last year. As I noted Saturday, almost half of Poland welcomed Obama’s decision to scrap the proposed missile defense program. Less than a third opposed the decision. No doubt the 31% that had a negative reaction looks back at the Bush years more fondly, but it is simply untrue that Poland as a whole prefers Bush to Obama.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.