<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elections Update: Conservatives in the Lead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poligazette.com/2009/11/02/elections-update-conservatives-in-the-lead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/11/02/elections-update-conservatives-in-the-lead/</link>
	<description>Because Common Sense Transcends Distance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:50:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dbollard</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/11/02/elections-update-conservatives-in-the-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-105393</link>
		<dc:creator>dbollard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=16812#comment-105393</guid>
		<description>amazed too see President numbers holding after dropping so far so fast! wasn&#039;t he in the 70&#039;s last winter? will probably drop more after election then hopefully for him it will stabilize or else he is politically in trouble. he should take a lesson from Clinton and run to the center as fast as possible or it will be a one term president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amazed too see President numbers holding after dropping so far so fast! wasn&#8217;t he in the 70&#8217;s last winter? will probably drop more after election then hopefully for him it will stabilize or else he is politically in trouble. he should take a lesson from Clinton and run to the center as fast as possible or it will be a one term president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/11/02/elections-update-conservatives-in-the-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-105370</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=16812#comment-105370</guid>
		<description>Turns out the robo-calls for Daggett are actually &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.politickernj.com/matt-friedman/34725/democrats-admit-paying-pro-daggett-call-obama-records-robocall-corzine&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;coming from NJ Dems&lt;/a&gt;. By slamming Christie and annoying people with ugly Daggett pimpage they hoped to swing a few voters to Corzine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out the robo-calls for Daggett are actually <a href="http://www.politickernj.com/matt-friedman/34725/democrats-admit-paying-pro-daggett-call-obama-records-robocall-corzine" rel="nofollow">coming from NJ Dems</a>. By slamming Christie and annoying people with ugly Daggett pimpage they hoped to swing a few voters to Corzine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jt</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/11/02/elections-update-conservatives-in-the-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-105317</link>
		<dc:creator>jt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=16812#comment-105317</guid>
		<description>Is that why Obama&#039;s approval has remained steady at 52%-43% for about 3 months now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that why Obama&#8217;s approval has remained steady at 52%-43% for about 3 months now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: higgins1990</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/11/02/elections-update-conservatives-in-the-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-105298</link>
		<dc:creator>higgins1990</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=16812#comment-105298</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait until the Dems get thrashed in 2010.  It will be high comedy listening to the WH and MSM spin that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait until the Dems get thrashed in 2010.  It will be high comedy listening to the WH and MSM spin that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/11/02/elections-update-conservatives-in-the-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-105295</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=16812#comment-105295</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s also &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703932904574511612622116146.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; to consider, which also trends against Christie.

The best defense against voter fraud is high margins. They can&#039;t (succesfully) cheat if it isn&#039;t close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703932904574511612622116146.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> to consider, which also trends against Christie.</p>
<p>The best defense against voter fraud is high margins. They can&#8217;t (succesfully) cheat if it isn&#8217;t close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/11/02/elections-update-conservatives-in-the-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-105291</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=16812#comment-105291</guid>
		<description>NY 23 is unique this round, and I wouldn&#039;t take that polling to the bank. It looks like Hoffman&#039;s seat to lose tomorrow, but in a low-turnout special election the margins of error in polling can be huge. Nor is it a good race to use as a barometer for anything. Not even for next year in the NY 23rd. 

New Jersey is a toss-up at this point, and despite Christie&#039;s polling roughly even, NJ tends to break Dem when the votes actually come in (with the usual assists from inner-city all-Dem precincts showing rather unbelievably high turnout...). The spoiler there is the Daggett faction. No one really knows if they&#039;ll stick with Daggett or jump ship for Corzine in any numbers. Rumor is that the GOP is funding robo-calls pushing Daggett...no verifications at this point, so that may just be Corzine propaganda aimed at peeling off voters from the &lt;i&gt;de facto&lt;/i&gt; Green candidat, who is pulling 10%+ numbers. In any case, unless Daggett fades out in the stretch it actually does look like a near thing, with just a slight edge to Corzine. 

An interesting vote to watch that has gotten very little national press is the attempt at a &quot;people&#039;s veto&quot; of the Maine gay marriage law, by referendum. The polling has been neck and neck, but spotty and substandard IMHO. That one hinges on turnout, which in turn depends on voter enthusiasm. My own take is that the law will stand, which would undercut the claims of a new national social-conservative wave. Out-of-state forces have plowed in lots of money (much more so on the repeal side than the let-it-stand side) and Mainers reflexively react stubbornly to outsider interference. 

The Virgina governership swings red again. Not a doubt in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NY 23 is unique this round, and I wouldn&#8217;t take that polling to the bank. It looks like Hoffman&#8217;s seat to lose tomorrow, but in a low-turnout special election the margins of error in polling can be huge. Nor is it a good race to use as a barometer for anything. Not even for next year in the NY 23rd. </p>
<p>New Jersey is a toss-up at this point, and despite Christie&#8217;s polling roughly even, NJ tends to break Dem when the votes actually come in (with the usual assists from inner-city all-Dem precincts showing rather unbelievably high turnout&#8230;). The spoiler there is the Daggett faction. No one really knows if they&#8217;ll stick with Daggett or jump ship for Corzine in any numbers. Rumor is that the GOP is funding robo-calls pushing Daggett&#8230;no verifications at this point, so that may just be Corzine propaganda aimed at peeling off voters from the <i>de facto</i> Green candidat, who is pulling 10%+ numbers. In any case, unless Daggett fades out in the stretch it actually does look like a near thing, with just a slight edge to Corzine. </p>
<p>An interesting vote to watch that has gotten very little national press is the attempt at a &#8220;people&#8217;s veto&#8221; of the Maine gay marriage law, by referendum. The polling has been neck and neck, but spotty and substandard IMHO. That one hinges on turnout, which in turn depends on voter enthusiasm. My own take is that the law will stand, which would undercut the claims of a new national social-conservative wave. Out-of-state forces have plowed in lots of money (much more so on the repeal side than the let-it-stand side) and Mainers reflexively react stubbornly to outsider interference. </p>
<p>The Virgina governership swings red again. Not a doubt in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doomed</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/11/02/elections-update-conservatives-in-the-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-105282</link>
		<dc:creator>Doomed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=16812#comment-105282</guid>
		<description>I can only repeat what I have been saying for years.

&quot;The cure for the GOP&#039;s trek in the wilderness is 2-4 years of Democratic rule.&quot;

In this case it seems to only have taken 8-10 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only repeat what I have been saying for years.</p>
<p>&#8220;The cure for the GOP&#8217;s trek in the wilderness is 2-4 years of Democratic rule.&#8221;</p>
<p>In this case it seems to only have taken 8-10 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palin Nails Socialist RINO Scozzafava to the WALL; BarackObama.com Bombshell revealed &#171; VotingFemale Speaks!</title>
		<link>http://www.poligazette.com/2009/11/02/elections-update-conservatives-in-the-lead/comment-page-1/#comment-105273</link>
		<dc:creator>Palin Nails Socialist RINO Scozzafava to the WALL; BarackObama.com Bombshell revealed &#171; VotingFemale Speaks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poligazette.com/?p=16812#comment-105273</guid>
		<description>[...] WATCH – the writings of SamHenry NY-23 Roundup &#124; bRight &amp; Early NY-23 &#124; Reclaim Conservatism PoliGazette » Elections Update: Conservatives in the Lead Scozzafava – The Chickens Coming Home to Roost « BUNKERVILLE &#124; God, Guns and Guts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WATCH – the writings of SamHenry NY-23 Roundup | bRight &amp; Early NY-23 | Reclaim Conservatism PoliGazette » Elections Update: Conservatives in the Lead Scozzafava – The Chickens Coming Home to Roost « BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
