Going Galt

November 2nd, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , , ,

In a post for Dutch blog Dagelijkse Standaard, I respond to an article written by another Dutch blogger, Erdebe. In it, Erdebe argues that it is time for the productive part of society to rebel against the socialistdemocrats running this country into the ground. Following in John Galt’s footsteps – the infamous character created by Ayn Rand – he has decided to work one day a week less. This way, he explains, he will earn less and, so, the government can take less from him as well.

Although I am certainly sympathetic towards such a sentiment, I’m afraid to say that I don’t for one second believe such a plan will work. The reason? Well, the weakness of it is that it assumes that social democrats and socialists actually care about what happens to society. I don’t for one second believe they do. They care about one thing: material equality. As long as they can make people ‘equal,’ they’re happy.

Many think that social democrats prefer a specific kind of equality, one in which all members of society are reasonably prosperous. I disagree. I believe they don’t care about that at all. How prosperous is irrelevant to them. They want all of us to be ‘equal’ and if that means equality in poverty and misery, so be it.

This means that we have to win the debate by other means. Going ‘on strike’ isn’t merely childish, it’s also counterproductive. We have to beat socialists and their little brothers social democrats, by convincing the electorate that although they may not all be equal under a conservative government, they will prosper. And that if they vote for leftists, well, they can look forward to being equal – equal in misery.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Bengt Larsson
    November 2nd, 2009 at 19:10
    Reply | Quote | #1

    What makes you think that Social Democrats don’t “actually care about what happens to society”, other than sheer madness? And is that specifically for the Netherlands (I can’t speak for that)?

  2. CFN
    November 4th, 2009 at 08:15
    Reply | Quote | #2

    If they cared about it they would give up some power and some central control to promote economic growth and some prosperity. To the far leftist control is more important than prosperity. They will never admit that but their actions show this to be true time and time again.

  3. CFN
    November 5th, 2009 at 21:28
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Why Go Galt when you can invest in China …. oh wait…..

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.