Romney Slams Huckabee Over Clemencies

December 5th, 2009 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags: , , , , , ,

Appearing on CNNs “Larry King Live,” former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney lashed out at former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee for granting clemency to Maurice Clemmons. Clemmons was found guilty of armed robbery and other violence crimes. Although prosecutors and Clemmons’ victims urged Huckabee not to pardon him, the governor did so nonetheless: a major and unforgivable mistake, because he shot and killed four police officers this last Sunday, while they were enjoying their coffee break.

Huckabee has been rightly criticized for his clemency of Clemmons (and other criminals) by many conservatives, including us at David Horowitz’s NewsRealblog. Leading Republicans stayed away from ClemencyGate, however, opting to let Huckabee commit political suicide by refusing to take responsibility for his actions and for their consequences. Until today, that is. Because today, Romney became the first politician with a shot at the GOP’s presidential nomination in 2012, to (indirectly) criticize ‘the Huckster’; who just so happened to be one of his main rivals for the party’s nomination last year. It’s a sign that favorites for 2012 believe that Huckabee can forget about challenging President Barack Obama three years from now.

When asked about Huckabee’s decision to commute Clemmons’ sentence, Romney said that he undoubtedly wouldn’t have done so, knowing then, what he knows now. As Hot Air’s AllahPundit points out, that’s as safe an answer as they come.

Read the whole thing at NewsRealblog.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Michael Merritt
    December 7th, 2009 at 05:50
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Firstly, Huck didn’t pardon Clemmons, he commuted his sentence. That’s when the sentence is taken away, but you’re still convicted of the crime. Clemmons is still a felon.

    Allah later noted that Romney has a reputation for being too hard-hearted when it comes to commutations and pardons.

    The thing is that I’m not sure what would be worse with Romney: That he’s a “never forgive” kind of guy, or that the guy he didn’t forgive was a veteran who was prevented from becoming a police officer because of a childhood mistake still being on his record.

    OR

    When being “tough on crime” and “support of the 2nd amendment” clash.

    All that said, it seems that Mike Huckabee has a reputation for being too soft-hearted. Though, trying to attack him for not holding a crystal ball up when he made his decision is the wrong way to go about it. Whatever the tough on crime crowd might want to believe, I’m not sure that burglaries are inherently violent.

  2. James
    December 7th, 2009 at 07:01
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Romney wasn’t the first to “slam” or criticize Huckabee. It was Tim Pawlenty.

  3. Amy
    December 7th, 2009 at 09:13
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Romney did not “slam” Huckabee at all. What a misleading headline! This website has a credibility problem.

  4. Kathy
    December 7th, 2009 at 15:40
    Reply | Quote | #4

    If I had to choose between a political leader who gave out too many commutations, or a leader who issued none, I’d choose the latter. It seems to me that Romney put the public safety, the decisions of the court and victim’s families ahead of all other considerations. As he said in his Larry King interview, Romney had a written set of guidelines for commutations and parole. As far as I can tell, Huckabee had NO GUIDELINES, didn’t reach out to the victim’s families and obviously did not prioritize the safety of the public.

    I’m with Romney, clearly, as is everybody else I know.

  5. Doomed
    December 7th, 2009 at 17:24
    Reply | Quote | #5

    The GOP is already in alinsky mode and turning on each other.

    I would remind them that we still have 3 years of Obama and 2010 congressional races to take back at least enough seats in congress to prevent Reid and Pelosi from legalizing some more bizarre laws designed to turn America into Europe LITE.

    or perhaps

    Europe HEAVY.

    Remember were Americans. We never do anything half arsed. If you can start wars. We finish em. If you can spend 1 trillion we can spend 2 trillion. If you can put a man in orbit we send em to the moon. If you can land a man on the moon we will send one to Mars.

    We don’t know how to be second fiddle so that is why our flirtation with this continual and gradual slide to socialism is frightening beyond measure.

    The GOP must stand strong and stand united against a common FOE….

  6. voter
    December 7th, 2009 at 17:30
    Reply | Quote | #6

    All of you Pawlenty, Romney, Palin supporters who just assume Huckabee is gone — (and he isn’t, trust me — just watch the polls as we go along) — should know that absolutely everything your candidate is saying thus far (and at this point the only guy who has remained above board is Newt Gingrich) — we Huckabee supporters are well aware of the statements. But if you are right — or Huckabee decides not to run — do you think that we are all going to rush out to your candidate after the dreadful things that have been said. Guess again.

  7. James
    December 7th, 2009 at 17:54
    Reply | Quote | #7

    Dear Huckabee supporter:

    Huckabee isn’t a god. He currently isn’t a pastor. He’s not above reproach. He’s not above criticism. What’s happening with Huckabee is something that did not happen during the campaign. Huckabee is FINALLY being vetted, albeit regarding only one aspect.

    Romney is right, Mike Huckabee is a good man with a good heart but he is a lousy exectuive. He was too soft on crime and he tax and spent money like a democrat. He is staunch conservative on abortion and defense, but that is the extent of his conservatism.

    As a Romney supporter, and a Mormon, I would take the opposite approach. If Mike Huckabee were the Republican presidential candidate in 2012, I would still vote for him over Obama.

    Why?

    Because despite Huckabee’s statements disparaging my religion, I am not voting for a Pastor in chief. I would much prefer Huckabee to Obama.

    Huckabee supporters should feel the exact way about Romney, Palin, or Pawlenty.

    Just my two cents…

  8. Doomed
    December 7th, 2009 at 18:23
    Reply | Quote | #8

    Huckabee supporters should feel the exact way about Romney, Palin, or Pawlenty.

    Sorta reminds me of John Kerry’s campaign in 2004.

    IM NOT BUSH.

    While the sentiment is there I think it requires a bit more then just voting for one or the other. It requires a united effort against not only the democrats.

    But against progressives. Liberals. The MSM. Hollywood and the other media types that would disparage and disgruntle every American into thinking the GOP hates America while reminding us of all the wonderful things the Democrats do for the poor and the working man.

    Like…preserving perpetual poverty for all so that the democrats message remains relevant.

  9. Dan
    December 7th, 2009 at 20:01
    Reply | Quote | #9

    No-one really likes Romney, so he doesn’t have any shot at 2012. But he is welcome to spend all of his dirty personal money trying to win again. He did after all get a bronze metal! Huckabee pardoned a then 16 year old kid guilty of robbery. The sentence was too harsh to get 108 years. The parole board freed him and failed to enforce the convicts parole guidelines. Stop making Huckabee an escape goat for political ambitions. Huckabee would be the great president of our time and and really hope he decides to give it another run.

  10. TruthandJustice
    December 7th, 2009 at 21:36

    Van der Galien wrote a title for this piece meant to raise hackles and inflame. Fail!

    Romney IN NO WAY, SHAPE, or FORM slammed Huckabee on clemencies. I watched the interview and I’ve seen it several times on CNN’s website and other locations. Romney was gracious and said Mike was a good governor and a good man. You can see for yourself.

    Don’t let others shape your thinking.

  11. TruthandJustice
    December 7th, 2009 at 21:47

    Dan, I could say that no one really likes Huckabee but that would an exageration… just like your statement about Romney. You sound like a conservative. Do you believe in capitalism? If you’re not a marxist, then you’d know that Romney’s money isn’t DIRTY and that he worked very hard to achieve the American dream that we’d all like to achieve.

    By the way, Romney didn’t take any pay as Governor of MA. He donated one million of his own money to help save the 2002 Winter Olympics and also donated his salary to charity. He quietly does a lot of charitable giving.

    This is how America became great. People are free to chart their own course, work hard, and contribute to society. Then, having achieved success, it’s the noble person who gives back and helps others. That is Mitt Romney.

  12. Bluto
    December 8th, 2009 at 03:01

    Hucabee granted clemency and pardons “Literally, every three days, for 10 years.”

    He took his “I’m a Christian Pastor”, right into the Executive Office.

    1200 pardons? Absolutely insane! When did he have time to Govern?

    Talk about a “Messianic Complex. Narcisist to the core.

    He is now reaping what he has sown. Mitt had it pegged during the campaign, Huck is a bleeding heart Liberal. And his naivete has ruined peoples lives.

    What goes around comes around, Hucky. Your games have caught up with you now.

    Bluto

  13. Doomed
    December 8th, 2009 at 16:29

    Bluto

    While Im not a Huck fan…I have a problem with your post.

    1200 pardons as you say and 1 person went bad and this person WAS NOT PARDONED but rather had his sentence reduced and then went before experts to determine his fitness for parole.

    There is nothing wrong with compassion and being a bleeding heart. Liberal?

    Who knows but right now the GOP should remain focused on Obama and the run amuck enabler congress he has in place.

    Right now those that would try to keep stirring up this type of angst over a commutation of a sentence Huckabee did years ago is either way too partisan or way to Democrat for my blood.

    Right now the focus should remain on Obama and this enabler congress. Period.

  14. Doomed
    December 8th, 2009 at 16:31

    The day after the 2010 elections let the name calling begin inside the GOP party.

    Until then?

    Seriously. The focus should remain squarely on Obama and Congress.

    That will be plenty of time for the GOP to drag each other thru the mud and the muck with the gleeful help of a complicit MSM and blogsphere.

  15. Chris
    December 9th, 2009 at 01:38

    @Amy
    Agreed – Romney did not slam Huckabee at all! Very misleading headline. Watch the clip of Larry King Live on youtube.

  16. FairTaxNow
    December 29th, 2009 at 21:14

    The December PPP poll had huckabee doing his best against Obama at 46/45 and beyond the margin of error ahead of Palin and Romney. His favorability ratings were esentially unchanged from November. Doesn’t appear the day in day out beatings had much effect on his popularity. Millions invite him into their homes every week. He has the highest rated weekend cable news show month after month. If he chooses to run he remains very formidable. last go around Romney spent 30 million to Huckabee’s 3 million and we saw how that worked out. This time huckabee will have considerably more funds to work with. The fair tax is sweeping the nation and a 140,000,000 voter campaign s being launched by the national organization. Huckabee was the main candidate to be forward looking and support this legislation to give the power and control back to the people not to mention putting our economy on steroids.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.