Progressive Hypocrisy On Transparency Now

January 7th, 2010 By: Arvak | Tags:

In 2001, when then Vice President Dick Cheney held closed meetings to draft an energy bill, progressives went berserk. They concocted elaborate schemes of oil executives being given the keys to U.S. energy policy, demanded Congressional hearings, considered impeachment, and filed lawsuits to demand the meetings be opened up. They preened with fetishes of democracy and transparency, insisting that they as the minority party had a transcendent moral right to be included in the deliberations over the transformation of a key area of the U.S. economy.

But now, as Democratic Congressional leaders convene to circumvent the normal conference process for the explicit purpose of excluding the minority party while considering the transformation of 20% of the entire U.S. economy, progressive bloggers and other activists are notably silent. Meanwhile, the White House is stonewalling media inquiries into President Obama’s blatant reversal of his campaign promise to open up any and all health care reform negotiations for broadcast on C-SPAN.

Can’t have the great unwashed see the sausage being made, you know, especially when it is so vitally important to blow certain things by them without them becoming aware of them, such as the proposals for cuts in Medicare payments to doctors that will result in thousands of Medicare patients being unable to find any physicians that will see them and the proposals to subject the health plans of middle class union members to confiscatory taxes that could double or triple the overall tax burden of those taxpayers. Shhh! Be wery quiet. We’re hunting wabbits!

UPDATE: Look at the reaction on Memeorandum. The silence from progressive bloggers is, as always, deafening. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Doomed
    January 8th, 2010 at 07:06
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Average per capita
    Medicare spending
    among bottom 90%:
    $2,934

    Average per capita
    Medicare spending
    among top 10%:
    $44,220

    Source…… http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/7305-04-2.pdf

    Someone tell me that in 10-15-20 years we will not be telling the top 10 percent to drop dead.

    Im not saying. Im just saying.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.